Connecticut Senate Bill SB00333

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/11
• Refer: 1/20/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Penalty For Manslaughter In The Second Degree With A Motor Vehicle.

Impact

If enacted, the changes outlined in SB00333 would amend section 53a-56b of the general statutes, thereby increasing the repercussions for individuals convicted of second-degree manslaughter while operating a motor vehicle under the influence. By establishing a rebuttable presumption that such actions indicate an 'extreme indifference to human life', the bill aims to bolster convictions and ensure that offenders face penalties more commensurate with the severity of their actions. This shift is anticipated to have broader implications for public safety and the enforcement of vehicular homicide laws.

Summary

SB00333 proposes significant changes to the existing laws regarding the penalty for manslaughter in the second degree committed with a motor vehicle. The bill aims to align the penalties for this offense with those for manslaughter in the first degree involving a firearm, reflecting a heightened seriousness about the consequences of causing death while operating a vehicle under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The intention behind this legislative change is to enforce stricter consequences for reckless behavior on the road, particularly among individuals driving under the influence.

Contention

Despite its intended objectives, the bill may face scrutiny regarding the implications of defining a rebuttable presumption as it pertains to due process. There could be concerns about how this changes the burden of proof in legal proceedings against individuals accused of manslaughter in such circumstances. Advocates argue that the legal alignment with firearm manslaughter laws is warranted, as the dangers of driving under the influence can be just as lethal, while opponents may express worries that such presumptions could undermine the presumption of innocence that is foundational to the judicial process. Overall, the debate surrounding SB00333 is likely to highlight the balance between strengthening public safety measures and ensuring fair legal practices.