Connecticut Senate Bill SB00700

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/11
• Refer: 1/24/11
• Refer: 3/2/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The State Matching Grant Program For Municipal And Regional Demand Responsive Transportation For Persons With A Disability Who Are Sixty Or More Years Of Age.

Impact

If enacted, SB00700 will amend existing state statutes related to the funding and administrative structure of the demand responsive transportation program. This restoration of funding is significant as it directly impacts the availability and quality of transportation services offered to vulnerable populations, thus enhancing mobility and access to essential services. In the context of a growing elderly population, such provisions are increasingly necessary to support their independence and mobility.

Summary

SB00700, an act concerning the state matching grant program for municipal and regional demand responsive transportation for persons with a disability who are sixty or more years of age, seeks to restore funding for this crucial program. This legislation is aimed at facilitating accessible transportation options for elderly individuals or those with disabilities, ensuring they can participate in community life without transportation barriers. The bill proposes a yearly allocation of five million dollars from the Transportation Strategy Board projects account to fund grants-in-aid and administrative expenses associated with this transportation initiative.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00700 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for the elderly and disabled communities. Supporters emphasize the importance of funding for demand responsive transportation, highlighting its role in promoting equality of access and community integration. There is a recognition of the challenges faced by these populations, and the bill is seen as a proactive measure to address a critical need within the transportation system.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for SB00700, potential points of contention may arise around the allocation of budgetary resources. Questions could be raised regarding the sustainability of the funding and whether five million dollars will suffice to meet the anticipated demand for services. Additionally, discussions may touch on the effectiveness of existing programs and whether targeted improvements are needed to maximize the impact of these funds.