Connecticut Senate Bill SB00835

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/11
• Refer: 1/26/11
• Report Pass: 3/18/11
• Refer: 3/29/11
• Report Pass: 4/5/11
• Refer: 4/27/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 5/4/11
• Engrossed: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 5/13/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Structures And Dredging Permit Process.

Impact

The passage of SB00835 is expected to address gaps in the existing permitting process, allowing for greater community participation and scrutiny over projects that could affect local waterways and coastal areas. The requirements for public notice and the ability for interested parties to voice their opinions are intended to ensure that environmental considerations are adequately considered before the approval of any construction or dredging activities.

Summary

SB00835 aims to modify the structures and dredging permit process within the state. The legislation emphasizes the need for transparency by mandating that applicants notify various stakeholders—including town officials, the Commissioner of Transportation, and owners of oyster grounds—before a permit is granted. By establishing a clear protocol for public notification and comment periods, the bill seeks to enhance community engagement in decisions affecting local environments and ecosystems.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB00835 appears to be supportive, particularly among environmental advocacy groups and community members who value local consultation in environmental decision-making. The legislation has received favorable votes, indicating a consensus on the necessity of enhancing public engagement within the permit process. However, some concerns may arise from developers and businesses who could perceive additional bureaucratic steps as a hindrance to project initiation.

Contention

Despite its positive reception, some contention may exist regarding the efficiency of the new permitting framework. Developers may argue that the added requirements for public notification and comment periods could delay projects, thereby impacting timelines and budgets. As the law aims to balance environmental protection with business interests, ongoing discussions could focus on finding the right equilibrium to facilitate both ecological oversight and economic development.