Connecticut Senate Bill SB00998

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Report Pass: 3/15/11
• Refer: 3/25/11
• Report Pass: 3/31/11
• Refer: 4/21/11
• Report Pass: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 4/27/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Registration For Crimes Committed With A Firearm.

Impact

The bill, if enacted, will result in the creation of a mandatory registry for gun offenders across municipalities. This system would not only require offenders to register but also to verify their information annually for four years following their conviction or release from prison. The information collected in this registry will be accessible to various law enforcement agencies, potentially aiding in crime prevention and public safety efforts. Under this bill, failure to comply with registration requirements could result in criminal penalties including fines and imprisonment.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 998 aims to establish a registration system for individuals convicted of firearm-related offenses in Connecticut. The legislation requires those convicted of designated 'gun offenses' to register with local police departments or law enforcement officers within 48 hours of their sentencing or release from custody. The intent is to enhance public safety by keeping track of individuals who have committed firearm offenses, allowing law enforcement agencies to maintain updated records on these offenders.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be predominantly supportive among lawmakers who prioritize public safety and crime reduction. Supporters of SB00998 argue that tracking gun offenders is a critical step in reducing gun violence and enhancing the effectiveness of law enforcement. However, there are concerns expressed by civil liberties advocates who worry that such measures may infringe on privacy rights and disproportionately impact certain communities. This divide highlights the ongoing debate between public safety initiatives and individual rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the scope of offenses classified as 'gun offenses' and the implications of mandatory registration for individuals who may have committed non-violent offenses. Critics of the bill argue that the broad definitions of gun offenses may lead to an overreach by law enforcement and increase the burden on individuals who have served their sentences. Additionally, there is apprehension regarding the potential stigmatization of gun offenders, which may hinder their reintegration into society and disproportionately affect marginalized groups.