Connecticut Senate Bill SB01219

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/24/11
• Refer: 3/24/11
• Report Pass: 4/15/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/2/11
• Refer: 5/11/11
• Report Pass: 5/16/11
• Report Pass: 5/17/11
• Engrossed: 6/2/11
• Report Pass: 6/3/11

Caption

An Act Concerning The Leasing Of Judicial Branch Facilities.

Impact

The implications of SB01219 extend to various operational aspects of state governance, particularly in how state agencies engage in transactions related to real estate. By centralizing power in the hands of the Commissioner of Public Works, the bill is expected to facilitate an expedited process for acquiring and leasing properties necessary for judicial needs. Furthermore, it instills a clearer framework for oversight, as any significant real estate transactions will still require scrutiny and approval from the State Properties Review Board.

Summary

Bill SB01219 amends existing statutes to centralize the authority regarding the leasing of judicial branch facilities to the Commissioner of Public Works in Connecticut. The main purpose of the bill is to streamline operations and enhance efficiency in the leasing process for judicial facilities, thereby ensuring that the state can efficiently manage its real estate. By replacing previous regulations that allowed various entities to act independently in this domain, the bill aims to reinforce a more cohesive strategy regarding state property management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01219 leans towards a favorable view among supporters, primarily focused on the operational efficiency it promises. Advocates argue that consolidating authority will not only make the leasing process less cumbersome but also lead to better deals for the state. Conversely, there may be concerns among some stakeholders regarding the reduction of autonomy for other departments and entities that were previously involved in real estate leasing. This shift could lead to debates on the balance between centralized authority and the autonomy of various state institutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention in SB01219 include the potential impacts on other agencies that previously had a say in leasing decisions. Critics may argue that the bill could diminish the ability of specialized departments to pursue leases aligned with their particular needs, such as adaptations for judicial services. Moreover, discussions around possible inefficiencies caused by funneling all real estate leasing through a single entity may emerge, with concerns that it could lead to bottlenecks in urgent or specialized situations.