Connecticut Senate Bill SB01231

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/11
• Refer: 3/30/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Notice Of An Action Regarding A Defective Highway, Bridge, Sidewalk, Road Or Railing.

Impact

If SB01231 is enacted, it would significantly change how claims can be pursued against the state or local governments for injuries resulting from defective infrastructure. Under the current law, individuals have a restricted time frame to notify the responsible party about their injuries; however, with the proposed amendments, this timeframe has been extended. Supporters argue that this will allow more time for those affected to provide the necessary details and hence, pursue claims more effectively. This is particularly important for individuals who might need additional time to understand the full context of their injuries following an investigation.

Summary

SB01231, titled 'An Act Concerning Notice of an Action Regarding a Defective Highway, Bridge, Sidewalk, Road or Railing', seeks to amend the existing statue regarding the notice requirements for individuals who sustain injuries due to defective infrastructure maintained by the state or local municipalities. The bill proposes an extended timeframe for individuals to provide written notice regarding their injuries. Specifically, it allows for this notice to be given up to one hundred eighty days after the completion of a police investigation, which is an increase from prior regulations. This change is aimed at enabling individuals more time to gather information necessary to determine the cause of action before proceeding with legal claims.

Contention

The bill has sparked discussion around the balance between protecting individuals’ rights to seek damages and the state’s interests in minimizing liability exposure. Critics raise concerns that extending the notice period may lead to an increased number of claims against the state, potentially straining public resources. Furthermore, there are potential worries about the efficiency of the complaints process, and whether this will lead to delays in the state's ability to address infrastructure deficiencies. Proponents, on the other hand, emphasize the importance of ensuring that injured individuals are not unfairly disadvantaged in their pursuit of recovery due to strict notice requirements at a time when they may already be dealing with the ramifications of their injuries.