Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05057

Introduced
2/14/12  
Introduced
2/14/12  
Refer
2/14/12  
Refer
2/14/12  
Report Pass
2/23/12  
Report Pass
2/23/12  
Refer
2/28/12  
Refer
2/28/12  
Report Pass
3/6/12  
Report Pass
3/6/12  
Engrossed
4/4/12  
Report Pass
4/9/12  
Report Pass
4/9/12  
Chaptered
5/8/12  
Chaptered
5/8/12  
Enrolled
5/9/12  
Enrolled
5/9/12  
Passed
5/14/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Penalties For The Violation Of Mechanical Contractor Registration Requirements.

Impact

The legislation repeals and revises existing statutes related to mechanical contractor registration under Section 20-341s of the general statutes. By modifying the definitions and responsibilities of mechanical contractors, the bill seeks to enhance consumer protection and ensure that companies meet the necessary licensing requirements. The introduction of fines for non-compliance—$1,000 for the first offense and $2,500 for subsequent offenses—serves to deter practices that may endanger public safety or undermine industry standards.

Summary

House Bill No. 5057, also known as the Act Concerning Penalties for the Violation of Mechanical Contractor Registration Requirements, aims to strengthen regulations surrounding mechanical contractors in Connecticut. The bill defines what constitutes a mechanical contractor and establishes explicit penalties for those who fail to obtain proper registration or employ unlicensed workers. The effective date of these changes is set for October 1, 2012, marking a significant update to existing statutes regarding mechanical contractor practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB05057 appears to be supportive among consumer advocacy groups and those favoring stricter regulations within the mechanical contracting industry. Proponents argue that the bill will provide greater assurance of safety and quality in mechanical work. Conversely, some industry stakeholders may view the increased penalties and regulatory oversight as a burdensome imposition that could affect operational costs and business viability.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the balance between regulatory compliance and business flexibility within the mechanical contracting sector. Critics might argue that while the objective of consumer protection is essential, overly stringent penalties could disproportionately impact smaller contractors who may struggle with compliance. The conversation around this bill highlights ongoing debates about the role of regulation in supporting both consumer welfare and the competitiveness of small businesses in the marketplace.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00209

An Act Concerning Nonresident Landlord Registration And Increasing Penalties For Repeat Building And Fire Code Violations.

CT HB05376

An Act Concerning Home Improvement Contractors And Salespersons.

CT HB05151

An Act Concerning Solar Licensing Exemptions.

CT SB00135

An Act Establishing A Maximum Charge For Certain Occupational Licenses, Certifications, Permits And Registrations.

CT SB00428

An Act Concerning Business Registrations Filed With The Secretary Of The State.

CT HB05324

An Act Establishing Secondary Traffic Violations.

CT SB00134

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Minor And Technical Revisions To Statutes Concerning Consumer Protection.

CT SB00343

An Act Concerning Membership Of The Codes And Standards Committee And Battery-charged Security Fences.

CT HB05236

An Act Concerning Recommendations By The Department Of Consumer Protection.

CT SB00389

An Act Concerning The State Contracting Standards Board And State Procurement.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.