Connecticut House Bill HB05319

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/12
• Refer: 2/24/12
• Report Pass: 3/7/12
• Refer: 3/16/12
• Report Pass: 3/22/12
• Refer: 4/4/12
• Report Pass: 4/10/12
• Engrossed: 5/4/12
• Report Pass: 5/5/12
• Chaptered: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 5/31/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Persons Aggrieved By Decisions Of Municipal Land Use Boards And The Penalties For Violating Municipal Blight Ordinances.

Impact

The bill's passage will regulate how municipalities can enforce blight regulations, emphasizing the need for prior written notice and a chance for property owners to remediate issues. It defines the enforcement process and increases the potential penalties for continued violations, which can now accrue daily. Furthermore, it allows municipalities designated agents to remediate conditions under certain circumstances, fostering a more proactive approach to managing blight.

Summary

House Bill 5319 addresses issues related to municipal land use decisions and the enforcement of blight ordinances. The bill entitles 'An Act Concerning Persons Aggrieved By Decisions Of Municipal Land Use Boards and The Penalties For Violating Municipal Blight Ordinances' aims to clarify the definition of 'aggrieved persons' and enhance local authority to regulate and enforce measures against housing blight. It imposes civil penalties for violations and specifies the procedures municipalities must follow before entering properties deemed to have blighted conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 5319 has generally been positive among those advocating for stronger local control over land use and blight regulations. Supporters view it as a necessary tool in combating disrepair and deteriorating conditions in communities. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the implications of increased penalties and enforcement measures, particularly among property owners worried about potential overreach or unfair enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention center on the balance between empowering municipalities and ensuring property owners receive fair treatment under the law. While the bill provides a framework for municipalities to combat blight effectively, detractors warn that stringent penalties could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, particularly those struggling with financial hardships. This has led to ongoing discussions about the best methods for regulating blight while safeguarding property rights.