Connecticut House Bill HB05334

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/12
• Refer: 2/28/12
• Report Pass: 3/23/12
• Refer: 4/2/12
• Report Pass: 4/10/12
• Engrossed: 5/8/12
• Report Pass: 5/9/12

Caption

An Act Concerning The Sale Or Abandonment Of Water Supply Sources And Associated Land.

Impact

The implementation of HB 05334 is expected to tighten regulations surrounding water supply management in the state. By mandating permits for abandonment or sale, the bill places an emphasis on accountability and thorough assessment of water resources. The Commissioner is entrusted with the discretion to approve or deny these applications based on a comprehensive evaluation, which includes considerations of future water supply needs and environmental implications. This change seeks to enhance the management of water resources while simultaneously having a positive impact on public health outcomes related to water usage.

Summary

House Bill 05334 addresses the sale or abandonment of water supply sources and the associated land. It requires that no water supply source supplying water to a public system can be abandoned or sold without obtaining a permit from the Commissioner of Public Health. The bill aims to ensure that the disposal of these resources is done in a regulated manner, safeguarding public health by preventing any potential mishandling that could affect water quality and availability. This legislative effort emphasizes the importance of maintaining a reliable water supply, which is crucial not only for consumption but also for the sustainability of communities relying on these resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05334 appears to be generally positive, especially among those prioritizing public health and environmental protection. Proponents of the bill highlight its preventive measures against potential misuse of crucial water resources. However, there may be concerns from entities involved in water management regarding bureaucratic hurdles that could arise from increased regulatory oversight and permitting processes. Ultimately, the perceived necessity of such regulations reflects a collective acknowledgment of the integral role that reliable water supply management plays in safeguarding community health and resources.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as necessary for promoting regulatory oversight, some contention arises regarding the balance between rigorous regulation and operational flexibility for water companies. Critics argue that additional permitting requirements could impede efficient management or operational responses to changing demand or environmental conditions. There is also concern that it could extend the timeline for critical resource decisions, affecting water supply continuity. As the bill progresses, these points of contention may lead to discussions about exceptions or expedited processes to ensure responsiveness without compromising public health safeguards.