Connecticut House Bill HB05360

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/29/12
• Refer: 2/29/12
• Report Pass: 3/20/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Refer: 4/10/12
• Report Pass: 4/17/12
• Engrossed: 5/5/12
• Report Pass: 5/5/12
• Chaptered: 5/30/12
• Enrolled: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Prohibiting Certain Persons From Allowing Minors To Possess Alcoholic Liquor In Dwelling Units And On Private Property.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05360 would amend existing statutes related to the possession of alcohol by minors, introducing more stringent requirements for property owners. This change signifies a shift in accountability; individuals who allow minors to possess liquor could face legal repercussions, including being charged with a class A misdemeanor. This legislation could lead to increased compliance measures by property owners to ensure they do not inadvertently facilitate underage drinking scenarios.

Summary

House Bill 05360 aims to prohibit certain individuals from allowing minors to possess alcoholic liquor within dwelling units and on private property. The legislation outlines clear responsibilities for property owners and occupants regarding the presence of minors and alcohol, emphasizing the need for reasonable efforts to prevent such possession. The bill is a response to concerns surrounding underage drinking and the roles that adult supervision and property control play in mitigating this issue.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05360 appears to be largely supportive, as many stakeholders recognize the importance of addressing underage drinking. Advocates argue that legislation like this is crucial for the protection of minors. However, there is also a degree of concern regarding the implications for property owners and the potential for overreach in enforcement, as some argue that it places an undue burden on individuals when minors access alcohol without their knowledge.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around the bill include concerns about the feasibility of enforcement and the potential for punitive measures against individuals who may not be aware that minors are in possession of alcohol on their property. Critics question whether the implications of the bill might create fear among property owners and lead to overly cautious behaviors that restrict social gatherings. Overall, the conversation indicates a balancing act between protecting minors and not unfairly penalizing property owners.