Connecticut Senate Bill SB00213

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/12
• Refer: 2/22/12
• Report Pass: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/16/12
• Report Pass: 3/22/12
• Refer: 4/11/12
• Report Pass: 4/13/12
• Report Pass: 4/17/12
• Refer: 4/18/12
• Report Pass: 4/20/12
• Report Pass: 4/23/12
• Engrossed: 5/2/12
• Report Pass: 5/4/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Internet Access For Registrars Of Voters.

Impact

The implementation of SB00213 is expected to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the voter registration process within Connecticut. By ensuring that registrars have internet access and the ability to correspond electronically, the bill aims to streamline voter registration and enhance the management of official records. This change is anticipated to foster better coordination and information sharing among registrars, ultimately contributing to a more accessible electoral process.

Summary

SB00213, entitled 'An Act Concerning Internet Access for Registrars of Voters', aims to ensure that registrars of voters in each town have adequate support and resources to perform their duties effectively. The bill mandates that towns provide registrars with the necessary office space, supplies, and equipment, including robust internet access. This legislation reflects an effort to modernize the operations of voter registration by facilitating better communication between registrars and the Secretary of the State using electronic mail.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00213 appears to be largely positive, with support from members across the legislature who recognize the importance of adapting to technological advancements. The bill is viewed as a necessary step towards enhancing the operational capacities of local registrars, ensuring they can adequately fulfill their responsibilities in the digital age. Potential opposition may stem from budget concerns or differing opinions on the level of state mandates placed on local authorities.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding SB00213 may revolve around the funding and resources required for towns to implement the changes mandated by the bill. While proponents argue the benefits and efficiencies that will arise from improved internet access for registrars, opponents could raise concerns regarding the financial burden on municipalities, especially in economically constrained areas. Additionally, discussions may arise about the implications of increased state oversight versus local control of voter registration processes.