Connecticut Senate Bill SB00315

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/29/12
• Refer: 2/29/12
• Report Pass: 3/20/12
• Refer: 3/27/12
• Report Pass: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/26/12
• Report Pass: 5/1/12
• Engrossed: 5/2/12
• Report Pass: 5/4/12

Caption

An Act Prohibiting The Unnecessary Collection Of Social Security Numbers.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly impact state laws by reinforcing the legal framework surrounding data protection and privacy. Specifically, it sets clear boundaries on when and how Social Security numbers can be collected, promoting safer practices for personal information management. The bill also underscores the state's commitment to privacy standards, aligning with broader trends in data protection legislation at both state and federal levels. Moreover, it introduces civil penalties for violators, reinforcing compliance among businesses.

Summary

SB00315, an Act Prohibiting the Unnecessary Collection of Social Security Numbers, aims to safeguard individuals' personal data by restricting the circumstances under which businesses can request and collect Social Security numbers. The bill highlights the importance of protecting sensitive information to prevent identity theft and enhance privacy. It establishes that entities doing business within the state must not solicit Social Security numbers unless specified exceptions apply, effectively limiting unnecessary data collection practices.

Sentiment

The reception of SB00315 appears to be overwhelmingly positive among legislators, as the voting history indicates broad support with a Senate roll call vote resulting in 36 yeas and no nays. This unanimous backing highlights a collective recognition of the necessity to protect individuals' sensitive information, suggesting that lawmakers prioritize the safeguarding of personal data and support the move towards stricter privacy regulations.

Contention

While there appears to be major support for the bill, considerations around enforcement and compliance may arise. The exceptions laid out regarding when Social Security numbers can still be collected provide a framework but could lead to debate over which situations are deemed necessary or unnecessary. Furthermore, the implementation of civil penalties may be scrutinized concerning proportionality and the administrative burden placed on businesses, particularly small enterprises. Overall, the bill reflects a significant commitment to protecting personal privacy but may require ongoing discussion to fine-tune its practical applications.