Connecticut House Bill HB05263

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/13
• Refer: 1/14/13

Caption

An Act Increasing The Maximum Fine For Unsolicited Telephonic Sales Calls.

Impact

If enacted, this amendment to the existing law will significantly increase the financial burden on those businesses that disregard the stipulations of the 'Do Not Call' registry. With greater fines in place, companies may be more inclined to adhere to marketing regulations and respect consumer preferences regarding telemarketing. This change is expected to provide consumers with a greater sense of security when it comes to unwanted sales calls and could lead to a decrease in the frequency of such calls overall. The increase in penalties may also generate additional revenue for the state through fines collected from violators.

Summary

House Bill 05263 proposes an increase in the maximum fines imposed for violations related to unsolicited telephonic sales calls. The bill specifically amends section 42-288a of the general statutes, raising the penalty from eleven thousand to sixteen thousand dollars per violation. The legislative intent is to strengthen consumer protections against intrusive and unwanted telemarketing practices, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the 'Do Not Call' list. By imposing stricter financial repercussions on violators, the bill aims to deter companies from making unsolicited calls to consumers who have opted out of such communications.

Contention

The discussion surrounding HB 05263 may involve differing opinions on the balance between protecting consumers and placing excessive burdens on businesses. Advocates for consumer rights will likely support the bill, citing the need for stronger enforcement to combat persistent telemarketing tactics. However, some business representatives could argue that increased fines may disproportionately affect smaller companies that may struggle with compliance. Concerns about regulatory overreach and whether the increased fines will truly deter unwanted calls could also be points of contention in legislative debates.