Connecticut House Bill HB06420

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/13
• Refer: 2/15/13

Caption

An Act Concerning Affordable Housing.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would update the legal framework governing affordable housing projects in Connecticut, particularly around the timing and conditions under which appeals can be made. The changes could simplify and streamline the development process for affordable housing within the state, potentially leading to an increase in the construction and availability of affordable units. However, it could also mean that neighbors or local communities would have fewer opportunities to challenge or appeal developments during these periods, which could raise concerns among community members about the adequacy of local input in housing decisions.

Summary

House Bill 06420, titled 'An Act Concerning Affordable Housing,' aims to amend the existing affordable housing land use appeals process outlined in section 8-30g of the Connecticut General Statutes. The bill proposes a significant change whereby the affordable housing appeals mechanism would not apply to applications filed during a specified moratorium period. This moratorium would be defined as the four-year period following either the publication of a certification of project completion or notice of provisional approval. The intention behind this change is likely to provide certain developers relief from appeals during the time when they are actively engaged in satisfying affordable housing requirements.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB06420 could revolve around the balance between encouraging affordable housing development and ensuring community oversight and local governance. Supporters of the bill may argue that modifying the appeal process is necessary to address housing shortages and expedite development processes, while critics may contend that reducing the ability to appeal during moratoriums undermines community rights and local governance structures. Such a shift in policy could catalyze debates regarding the trade-offs between developmental quickness and community representation.