Connecticut House Bill HB06586

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/13
• Refer: 3/6/13
• Report Pass: 4/19/13
• Refer: 4/29/13
• Report Pass: 5/6/13
• Refer: 5/14/13

Caption

An Act Eliminating The Filing Fees Associated With The Termination Or Dissolution Of Certain Business Entities.

Impact

The introduction of the bill has implications on state laws regarding business operations and governance. Specifically, it amends existing regulations to remove financial fees that can hinder the effective termination of business entities. By doing so, HB 06586 promotes an environment where businesses can exit the market without incurring prohibitive costs, thus potentially leading to a more competitive business landscape in the state. This shift could encourage entrepreneurs to launch new ventures without the fear of financial loss when deciding to dissolve a failing business.

Summary

House Bill 06586 aims to eliminate filing fees associated with the termination or dissolution of certain business entities. By repealing existing statutes that impose financial burdens on businesses seeking to dissolve or terminate their operations, this bill seeks to streamline the process and provide cost savings for business owners. This legislative change is particularly relevant for small businesses and startups, which may face significant hurdles in the dissolution process when financial resources are often limited.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 06586 appears to be largely positive among small business advocates and entrepreneurs who view the measure as a necessary reform. Supporters argue that eliminating these fees will not only reduce the financial strain on businesses looking to dissolve but also remove bureaucratic obstacles that can complicate the winding down process. However, concerns were raised by those worried about revenue loss for the state, as these fees contribute to the state budget and support various regulatory functions.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the long-term financial implications for the state and whether the loss of fee revenue could negatively affect regulatory oversight. Critics argue that while the intent to assist businesses is commendable, it is essential to consider how removing these fees could impact state resources. Balancing the need for regulatory oversight with the desire for business-friendly reforms is a central theme in the discussions related to HB 06586.