Connecticut House Bill HB06653

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/13
• Refer: 3/14/13
• Report Pass: 3/27/13
• Refer: 4/5/13
• Report Pass: 4/11/13
• Refer: 4/16/13
• Report Pass: 4/23/13
• Refer: 4/29/13
• Engrossed: 5/28/13
• Report Pass: 5/30/13
• Chaptered: 6/11/13
• Enrolled: 6/13/13
• Passed: 6/24/13

Caption

An Act Concerning Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection Regulatory Streamlining To Assist Municipalities.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6653 would specifically amend procedural requirements related to permit applications, ensuring that municipalities can submit applications more efficiently. The modifications include provisions for the notification processes required when filing permit applications, which would be streamlined to expedite municipal actions. The intent is to facilitate quicker approvals, thus promoting municipal development and environmental initiatives that align with the state’s energy policies.

Summary

House Bill 6653, titled 'An Act Concerning Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection Regulatory Streamlining To Assist Municipalities', aims to simplify and enhance the processes surrounding energy and environmental regulation at the state and municipal levels. The bill proposes a series of amendments to existing statutes pertaining to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP), focusing on the permit application process. These modifications are expected to relieve some of the bureaucratic burdens faced by municipalities when seeking necessary permits to carry out environmental and energy-related projects.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 6653 appears to be positive, especially among municipal leaders and those advocating for more responsive governmental processes. Supporters argue that the bill addresses long-standing inefficiencies within the permit application process that have hindered local governments from swiftly moving forward with essential projects. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential oversight and regulatory sufficiency in protecting environmental standards, which could lead to opposition from environmental advocacy groups.

Contention

The notable points of contention regarding HB 6653 revolve around the balance between efficient regulatory processes and rigorous environmental oversight. While proponents emphasize the need for streamlined processes to aid municipal functions and development, opponents worry that quickened application processes might lead to lax environmental protections. The ongoing debate illustrates the complexity of navigating environmental regulations while ensuring local government needs are met without compromising ecological integrity.