Connecticut House Bill HB06662

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/13
• Refer: 3/15/13
• Report Pass: 4/19/13
• Refer: 4/29/13
• Report Pass: 5/6/13
• Engrossed: 5/16/13
• Report Pass: 5/20/13
• Chaptered: 6/6/13
• Enrolled: 6/10/13
• Passed: 6/24/13

Caption

An Act Concerning The Recoupment Of Moneys Owed To A Unit Owners' Association Due To Nonpayment Of Assessments.

Impact

The enactment of HB 06662 is expected to positively impact unit owners' associations by providing them with legal clarity and authority in dealing with delinquent assessments. Specifically, the law prioritizes the associations’ liens above other debts and liens against the units, except for certain specific exceptions. This legislation aims to ensure that associations can better manage their finances and maintain the services and amenities available to all residents. Additionally, the bill could contribute to more stable financial conditions within community associations, which could influence property values positively.

Summary

House Bill 06662, titled 'An Act Concerning The Recoupment Of Moneys Owed To A Unit Owners' Association Due To Nonpayment Of Assessments', aims to clarify and enhance the process by which homeowners' associations can recover unpaid assessments from unit owners. The bill establishes clear procedures for notifying unit owners of their overdue assessments, and delineates the circumstances under which associations may initiate foreclosure actions to recover these debts. Importantly, the bill sets a nine-month limit on the priority of liens for assessments owed to the association, which can significantly affect the financial responsibilities of unit owners regarding their dues to the association.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 06662 seems to be predominantly supportive, especially among community management and homeowners' associations that experience challenges in recouping unpaid assessments. Advocates argue that the legislation protects the integrity of community living and ensures that members pay their fair share for shared services. However, some concerns have been expressed regarding the potential burden this may impose on unit owners facing financial hardships, making it crucial for associations to adopt fair practices for managing dues.

Contention

A significant point of contention involves the balance between ensuring that associations can effectively collect due payments and the implications this has for individual homeowners. While it is necessary for associations to have the ability to enforce payment of dues to maintain community welfare, opponents of the strict foreclosure provisions argue that such measures could lead to severe penalties for unit owners. This creates a critical discussion on the need for consumer protections versus the financial needs of the associations.