Connecticut House Bill HB06700

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/10/13
• Refer: 4/10/13

Caption

An Act Concerning The Dram Shop Act.

Impact

The passage of HB 6700 would signify a notable change in state law, particularly in how alcoholic beverage sellers manage their responsibilities concerning intoxicated customers. By defining intoxication in relation to blood alcohol content and the influence of intoxicating liquor, the bill intends to create a more structured approach to accountability for sellers. This could lead to increased vigilance among bartenders and alcohol retailers and could potentially reduce instances of drunk driving and related accidents as sellers may refuse service to individuals closely approaching intoxication levels. Overall, these changes aim to balance the interests of public safety with the operational realities of businesses in the alcoholic beverage industry.

Summary

House Bill 6700 proposes amendments to the Dram Shop Act with the primary objective of clarifying the definition of 'intoxicated person' as it relates to the liability of sellers of alcoholic beverages. The bill stipulates that if a seller sells alcohol to someone who is intoxicated and that individual subsequently causes injury to another person or their property, the seller can be liable for damages up to $250,000. This limit is set for cases where the intoxicated individual harms others due to their state. The bill emphasizes the importance of written notice provided by the injured party, which must be submitted within 120 to 180 days from the date of injury, depending on circumstances.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may stem from concerns over the potential liability that could be imposed on sellers. Critics may argue that such stringent definitions of intoxication and subsequent liability could unfairly burden small business owners and hospitality establishments with the risk of significant financial repercussions. Furthermore, there may be discussions regarding whether the one-year statute of limitations for bringing a claim is sufficient for injured parties to gather evidence and prepare their cases. Ultimately, the effectiveness of these amendments in achieving their intended outcomes in reducing alcohol-related incidents will likely be a point of ongoing debate among lawmakers, business owners, and public health advocates.