Connecticut Senate Bill SB00325

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/13
• Refer: 1/23/13

Caption

An Act Requiring Manufacturers Of Consumer Goods To Stock Repair And Replacement Parts.

Impact

The proposed legislation is set to enhance consumer protection statewide. By mandating that manufacturers keep spare parts in stock for at least seven years, the bill ensures that consumers can fix their products rather than being forced to dispose of items due to unavailability of necessary repair components. This change could lead to less electronic waste and contribute to sustainability initiatives, as products are kept in use longer rather than discarded. Furthermore, it places accountability on manufacturers to provide continued support for their products, aligning with best practices observed in other industries such as automotive and appliances.

Summary

SB00325, introduced by Senator Fasano, aims to amend state laws by requiring manufacturers of consumer goods to stock repair and replacement parts for a minimum period of seven years after the retail sale of such goods. This bill is rooted in a consumer protection philosophy, ensuring that consumers have access to necessary parts for repairs, which can extend the lifespan of their purchased goods and potentially reduce waste. The proponents argue that having readily available parts promotes consumer rights and aids in maintaining the functionality of products over time.

Contention

While the bill is designed to benefit consumers, there may be contention regarding the implications for manufacturers. Opponents may raise concerns about the potential burden this requirement could place on smaller manufacturers, who may lack the resources to maintain an extensive inventory of parts for an extended period. There could also be discussions about the economic feasibility of the bill for companies that produce goods with short market cycles, as maintaining stock for seven years might not be practical. These points of contention highlight the balance lawmakers must strike between consumer protections and the economic realities faced by manufacturers.