Connecticut Senate Bill SB00384

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/13
• Refer: 1/23/13

Caption

An Act Creating A Set-aside Program For Disabled Veteran Contractors.

Impact

If enacted, SB00384 would amend Chapter 58 of the general statutes to include provisions that ensure a specified portion of state contracting opportunities is reserved for disabled veterans. The bill highlights the government's commitment to supporting veterans by providing them with equitable access to state resources, potentially alleviating some economic hardships they experience in starting and running their own businesses. This set-aside program could lead to increased opportunities for disabled veteran contractors, consequently boosting their economic status in the community.

Summary

SB00384 proposes the creation of a set-aside program specifically aimed at assisting disabled veteran contractors in obtaining state contracts. The bill mandates that state and quasi-public agencies that contract for goods and services exceeding ten thousand dollars each fiscal year must reserve at least three percent of these contracts for competitive bidding exclusively available to qualified disabled veteran contractors. This initiative aims to promote inclusivity and support for veterans who have become business owners after their military service, recognizing the unique challenges they face.

Contention

As with many legislative proposals, discussions surrounding SB00384 may reveal varied opinions regarding the implications of establishing such a set-aside program. Supporters may argue that it is a necessary step towards rectifying disadvantages faced by disabled veterans in accessing government contracts and ensuring that they are given fair representation in state dealings. Conversely, there may be concerns from other stakeholders regarding the effectiveness of set-aside programs in achieving long-term sustainability for disabled veteran businesses, as well as potential impacts on competition and higher costs for state agencies due to restricted bidding. These challenges could lead to debates on the proper balance between supporting veteran-owned businesses and maintaining open, competitive procurement processes.