Connecticut Senate Bill SB01006

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/13
• Refer: 2/28/13
• Report Pass: 3/12/13
• Refer: 3/19/13
• Report Pass: 3/26/13
• Engrossed: 4/18/13
• Report Pass: 4/19/13
• Chaptered: 6/20/13
• Enrolled: 6/26/13
• Passed: 7/11/13

Caption

An Act Requiring State Agencies To Cite Specific Statutory And Regulatory Authority For Their Actions.

Impact

The bill would have a significant impact on the operational framework of state agencies, specifically in how they communicate actions and decisions. By enforcing a requirement for agencies to provide clear citations of the laws or regulations they are acting upon, it aims to ensure that affected parties are adequately informed and can seek clarity or challenge decisions based on defined legal grounds. This could foster a more straightforward relationship between state authorities and the business community by reducing ambiguity in regulatory actions.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 1006, also known as the Act Requiring State Agencies to Cite Specific Statutory and Regulatory Authority for Their Actions, aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the actions of state agencies. The bill mandates that whenever a state agency takes action affecting individuals or business entities—such as issuing permits, licenses, or enforcement actions—those affected must be informed of the specific statutory or regulatory authority that permits such an action. This requirement ensures that entities have clarity regarding the legal basis of agency decisions that impact them.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB01006 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates of regulatory transparency and accountability. Proponents stress the importance of ensuring that government actions are not arbitrary and are based on an established legal foundation. There is a sense of support for the bill among legislators who believe that such transparency can enhance public trust in state governance. However, there may be apprehensions from some agencies regarding the administrative burden imposed by this additional requirement.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the practicality of implementing such regulations within various state agencies. Some critics question whether the added administrative load of ensuring compliance with transparency requirements could hinder timely decision-making, particularly in emergency situations concerning public health and safety. The balance between ensuring transparency and maintaining efficient operations is a key issue as discussions surrounding the bill progress, with concerns that excessive bureaucratic procedures could slow down necessary actions.