Connecticut Senate Bill SB01096

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/13
• Refer: 3/8/13
• Report Pass: 3/28/13
• Refer: 4/11/13
• Report Pass: 4/17/13
• Refer: 4/24/13
• Report Pass: 4/29/13
• Report Pass: 4/30/13
• Engrossed: 5/30/13
• Report Pass: 5/31/13
• Chaptered: 6/20/13
• Enrolled: 6/27/13
• Passed: 7/12/13

Caption

An Act Requiring Greater Transparency And A Transition Plan For The Governance Of The State Education Resource Center.

Impact

The proposed legislation will fundamentally alter how the SERC operates by imposing stringent transparency measures. It requires annual reporting on contracts and funding, thereby subjecting the center to oversight which could improve the management of resources dedicated to educational programs. Additionally, the establishment of a Connecticut School Reform Resource Center is intended to address specific needs in public education by focusing on professional development for educators and enhancing student performance through improved curriculum and support services.

Summary

Senate Bill 1096, titled 'An Act Requiring Greater Transparency and a Transition Plan for the Governance of the State Education Resource Center', aims to enhance the accountability and governance structure of the State Education Resource Center (SERC) in Connecticut. The bill mandates that the Commissioner of Education develop a thorough transition plan to potentially reconfigure SERC as a quasi-public agency, state agency, or nonprofit organization. This plan will include significant updates and reports regarding contracts, funding, and compensation within the agency to ensure transparent operations and efficacy in service delivery to public schools.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1096 appears to be generally positive, particularly among education advocates who see the need for greater accountability and effectiveness in educational governance. Supporters argue that these measures are essential for fostering educational equity and excellence. However, there may be some concerns regarding the transition process, especially from stakeholders worried about disruptions or changes to existing programs that benefit students.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the operational changes proposed in the bill. Some stakeholders may fear that transforming SERC into a new governance structure could lead to instability or alterations in the delivery of educational services. Additionally, disagreements may surface over the allocation of resources or the level of control that should be maintained by the state versus local education agencies. The balancing act between state oversight and local needs will necessitate careful consideration to address any potential pushback from the educational community.