Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05060

Introduced
2/10/14  
Introduced
2/10/14  
Refer
2/10/14  
Refer
2/10/14  
Report Pass
3/28/14  
Report Pass
3/28/14  
Refer
4/9/14  
Refer
4/9/14  
Report Pass
4/15/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Recording Of Police Activity By The Public.

Impact

The enactment of HB 5060 would have significant implications for state laws governing police conduct and the rights of citizens. Specifically, it creates clearer boundaries around the interaction between the public and law enforcement during instances of recording. This amendment underscores the importance of transparency in law enforcement and emphasizes a commitment to protecting civil liberties, particularly the right to free speech and expression as safeguarded by the First Amendment. It particularly focuses on the reformative approach to police-public interactions.

Summary

House Bill 5060, titled 'An Act Concerning The Recording Of Police Activity By The Public,' aims to safeguard the rights of citizens to record police activity while ensuring that law enforcement can maintain order and public safety. This bill explicitly prohibits peace officers from interfering with individuals who are lawfully recording their activities, with certain exceptions regarding public safety and the integrity of criminal investigations. It also stipulates that law enforcement agencies must adopt a model policy and training standards to operationalize these provisions effectively, thereby enhancing accountability within police work.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5060 has been largely supportive, especially among civil rights advocates and community organizations that champion transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Proponents argue that this legislation reinforces public oversight of police conduct, which can be crucial in safeguarding against abuses of power. Conversely, there are concerns voiced by some law enforcement officials regarding the potential for interference with police work and the challenges of implementing these provisions effectively while ensuring public safety.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the balancing act between ensuring citizens' rights to record police actions and maintaining public safety during law enforcement operations. Critics express concern that too much freedom to record may hinder police enforcement actions and could escalate tensions during encounters. Moreover, the practical aspects of training and policy implementation have been debated, particularly how to ensure compliance by all law enforcement agencies, indicating a broader discussion about the effectiveness and feasibility of this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05381

An Act Concerning The Use Of Police Body-worn Recording Equipment.

CT SB00431

An Act Concerning Fees For Copying, Reviewing And Redacting Records Created By Police Body-worn Recording Equipment And Dashboard Cameras.

CT SB00212

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

CT SB00427

An Act Concerning Police Animals And Dogs In Volunteer Canine Search And Rescue Teams.

CT HB05508

An Act Concerning Recommendations From The Juvenile Justice Policy And Oversight Committee.

CT SB00360

An Act Concerning The Transcript Fees Charged By Official Court Reporters And Court Reporting Monitors.

CT HB05399

An Act Concerning The Criminal Justice Response To Victims Of Sexual Assault.

CT HB05379

An Act Concerning The Duties Of The State Marshals And The Operation Of The State Marshal Commission And The State Marshals Advisory Board.

CT HB05421

An Act Concerning Unlawful Dissemination Of Intimate Images That Are Digitally Altered Or Created Through The Use Of Artificial Intelligence.

CT HB05467

An Act Concerning Firearms Background Checks.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.