Connecticut House Bill HB05118

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/14
• Refer: 2/13/14

Caption

An Act Concerning The Underground Damage Prevention Program.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 05118 are likely to have a significant impact on state laws concerning the excavation and management of underground utilities. By enforcing stricter notification requirements and establishing a centralized system for managing such notifications, the bill aims to reduce the incidents of unintentional damage to underground facilities, thereby enhancing public safety and minimizing economic losses to utilities. These reforms are seen as essential steps toward modernizing and streamlining the current damage prevention protocols, which, if implemented effectively, could lead to a decrease in service interruptions and repair costs associated with utility damage.

Summary

House Bill 05118, titled 'An Act Concerning The Underground Damage Prevention Program,' seeks to amend existing statutes related to the management and safety of underground utility facilities. The bill establishes a comprehensive framework for the prevention of damage to underground facilities through improved notification requirements for excavation and demolition activities. It outlines the responsibilities of public utilities and entities involved in such operations, mandating them to ensure that proper procedures for notifying affected parties are adhered to. Additionally, the bill sets forth the establishment of a centralized clearinghouse for receiving and disseminating notices related to these activities.

Contention

As discussions surrounding the bill occur, notable points of contention arise, particularly regarding the capacity of the proposed central clearinghouse and its effectiveness in handling notifications from various stakeholders. Opponents of the bill may raise concerns about the bureaucratic implications and whether the increased regulatory burden could hinder timely construction and excavation activities. Supporters argue that such measures will ultimately benefit both the public and utilities by fostering a safer environment and preventing costly accidents, creating a debate on balancing regulatory efficiency with operational flexibility.