Connecticut House Bill HB05259

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/14
• Refer: 2/19/14
• Report Pass: 3/13/14
• Refer: 3/24/14
• Report Pass: 3/31/14
• Engrossed: 4/10/14
• Report Pass: 4/14/14
• Chaptered: 5/5/14
• Enrolled: 5/7/14
• Passed: 5/12/14

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Debit Cards For Gasoline Purchases And Notification To Handicapped Drivers Of Self-service Pump Refueling Services.

Impact

The bill introduces changes to state laws related to consumer protection and accessibility. Amendments will require retail dealers to publicly display information on gasoline pumps regarding pricing for debit card transactions and the provision of assistance to handicapped drivers at self-service stations. These measures could potentially improve the consumer experience and promote fair practices within the fuel retail industry, particularly benefiting individuals with disabilities who may require additional assistance when refueling.

Summary

House Bill 05259 seeks to amend existing statutes regarding the use of debit cards for gasoline purchases and enhance the notification requirements for self-service pump refueling services, particularly for handicapped drivers. The legislation aims to ensure that consumers are well-informed about pricing practices, including the differentiation in price when paying with debit cards versus cash. It reflects a broader trend towards transparency in fuel pricing and consumer rights, specifically targeting the accessibility of fuel services for handicapped individuals.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 05259 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for consumer rights and those focused on accessibility for disabled individuals. Supporters argue that the measures proposed will help protect consumers from unfair practices and ensure essential services are accessible to all. However, there may be some opposition from fuel retailers concerned about the implications for their operations and cost of compliance with new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the responsibilities imposed on retail dealers regarding sign displays and the administrative burden that may arise from compliance. Critics may argue that the requirements could lead to increased costs for retailers, particularly small business owners. Another potential area of debate is whether the regulations could be seen as excessive in terms of bureaucratic oversight, raising concerns about the balance between consumer protection and the operational freedoms of businesses.