Connecticut 2014 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05591 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/21/2014

                    General Assembly  Raised Bill No. 5591
February Session, 2014  LCO No. 2972
 *02972_______JUD*
Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY
Introduced by:
(JUD)

General Assembly

Raised Bill No. 5591 

February Session, 2014

LCO No. 2972

*02972_______JUD*

Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY 

Introduced by:

(JUD)

AN ACT CONCERNING THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM FOREIGN-COUNTRY MONEY JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) Sections 1 to 11, inclusive, of this act may be cited as the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act.

Sec. 2. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) As used in this section and sections 3 to 11, inclusive, of this act, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

(1) "Foreign country" means a government other than:

(A) The United States;

(B) A state, district, commonwealth, territory or insular possession of the United States; or

(C) Any other government with regard to which the decision in this state as to whether to recognize a judgment of that government's courts is initially subject to determination under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution.

(2) "Foreign-country judgment" means a judgment of a court of a foreign country.

Sec. 3. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act apply to a foreign-country judgment to the extent that the judgment:

(1) Grants or denies recovery of a sum of money; and 

(2) Under the law of the foreign country where rendered, is final, conclusive and enforceable.

(b) Sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act do not apply to a foreign-country judgment, even if the judgment grants or denies recovery of a sum of money, to the extent that the judgment is:

(1) A judgment for taxes;

(2) A fine or other penalty; or

(3) A judgment for divorce, support or maintenance, or other judgment rendered in connection with domestic relations.

(c) A party seeking recognition of a foreign-country judgment has the burden of establishing that sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act apply to the foreign-country judgment.

Sec. 4. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) (a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, a court of this state shall recognize a foreign-country judgment to which sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act apply.

(b) A court of this state may not recognize a foreign-country judgment if:

(1) The judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law;

(2) The foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or

(3) The foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter.

(c) A court of this state need not recognize a foreign-country judgment if:

(1) The defendant in the proceeding in the foreign court did not receive notice of the proceeding in sufficient time to enable the defendant to defend;

(2) The judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing party of an adequate opportunity to present its case;

(3) The judgment or the cause of action on which the judgment is based is repugnant to the public policy of this state or of the United States;

(4) The judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive judgment;

(5) The proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to an agreement between the parties under which the dispute in question was to be determined otherwise than by proceedings in that foreign court;

(6) In the case of jurisdiction based only on personal service, the foreign court was a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial of the action;

(7) The judgment was rendered in circumstances that raise substantial doubt about the integrity of the rendering court with respect to the judgment; or

(8) The specific proceeding in the foreign court leading to the judgment was not compatible with the requirements of due process of law.

(d) A party resisting recognition of a foreign-country judgment has the burden of establishing that a ground for nonrecognition set forth in subsection (b) or (c) of this section exists.

Sec. 5. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) (a) A foreign-country judgment may not be refused recognition for lack of personal jurisdiction if:

(1) The defendant was served with process personally in the foreign country;

(2) The defendant voluntarily appeared in the proceeding, other than for the purpose of protecting property seized or threatened with seizure in the proceeding or contesting the jurisdiction of the court over the defendant;

(3) The defendant, before the commencement of the proceeding, had agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the foreign court with respect to the subject matter involved;

(4) The defendant was domiciled in the foreign country when the proceeding was instituted or was a corporation or other form of business organization that had its principal place of business in, or was organized under the laws of, the foreign country;

(5) The defendant had a business office in the foreign country and the proceeding in the foreign court involved a cause of action arising out of business done by the defendant through that office in the foreign country; or

(6) The defendant operated a motor vehicle or airplane in the foreign country and the proceeding involved a cause of action arising out of that operation.

(b) The bases for personal jurisdiction set forth in subsection (a) of this section are not exclusive. The courts of this state may recognize bases for personal jurisdiction other than those set forth in subsection (a) of this section as sufficient to support a foreign-country judgment.

Sec. 6. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) (a) If recognition of a foreign-country judgment is sought as an original matter, the issue of recognition shall be raised by filing an action seeking recognition of the foreign-country judgment.

(b) If recognition of a foreign-country judgment is sought in a pending action, the issue of recognition may be raised by counterclaim, cross-claim or affirmative defense.

Sec. 7. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) If the court in a proceeding under section 6 of this act finds that the foreign-country judgment is entitled to recognition under sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act, then, to the extent that the foreign-country judgment grants or denies recovery of a sum of money, the foreign-country judgment is:

(1) Conclusive between the parties to the same extent as the judgment of a sister state entitled to full faith and credit in this state would be conclusive; and

(2) Enforceable in the same manner and to the same extent as a judgment rendered in this state.

Sec. 8. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) If a party establishes that an appeal from a foreign-country judgment is pending or will be taken, the court may stay any proceedings with regard to the foreign-country judgment until the appeal is concluded, the time for appeal expires or the appellant has had sufficient time to prosecute the appeal and has failed to do so.

Sec. 9. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) An action to recognize a foreign-country judgment shall be commenced within the earlier of the time during which the foreign-country judgment is effective in the foreign country or fifteen years from the date that the foreign-country judgment became effective in the foreign country.

Sec. 10. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) In applying and construing sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.

Sec. 11. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2014) Sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act do not prevent the recognition under principles of comity or otherwise of a foreign-country judgment not within the scope of sections 2 to 11, inclusive, of this act.

Sec. 12. Sections 50a-30 to 50a-38, inclusive, of the general statutes are repealed. (Effective October 1, 2014)

 


This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 2 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 3 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 4 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 5 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 6 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 7 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 8 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 9 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 10 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 11 October 1, 2014 New section
Sec. 12 October 1, 2014 Repealer section

This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:

Section 1

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 2

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 3

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 4

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 5

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 6

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 7

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 8

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 9

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 10

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 11

October 1, 2014

New section

Sec. 12

October 1, 2014

Repealer section

Statement of Purpose: 

To revise the Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act through adoption of the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act. 

[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.]