Connecticut Senate Bill SB00286

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/14
• Refer: 2/26/14

Caption

An Act Authorizing Certain Taxpayers To Apply For Reconsideration For Certain Tax Exemptions Reimbursed By The State.

Impact

The proposed legislation holds a significant impact on local tax policy in Connecticut. By enabling taxpayers to request reconsideration of denied tax exemptions, it ensures that everyone has a chance to challenge potentially unjust decisions made by municipal officials. If passed, it may lead to a more transparent approach to tax exemptions and could help rectify situations where taxpayers feel they have not been treated equitably. Additionally, it mandates a written response from the Secretary regarding the outcome of each request, further increasing accountability within the administrative process.

Summary

SB00286 aims to authorize certain taxpayers to apply for reconsideration regarding tax exemptions that are reimbursed by the state of Connecticut. This bill allows individuals or entities previously denied exemptions or having modifications to their exemptions to formally appeal these decisions. This process is facilitated through the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, which must notify claimants of any preliminary decisions and determine requests for hearings if needed. The bill is designed to enhance the fairness of the tax exemption process by providing a formal avenue for taxpayers to contest adverse determinations.

Contention

Despite its intended fairness, the bill may face contention regarding its implications for local governance. Some stakeholders might argue that allowing taxpayers to appeal decisions could overwhelm the resources of municipal officials and the Secretary’s office. Others might contend that this could lead to an increase in frivolous claims or appeals, thus complicating local tax administration and leading to longer processing times. Proponents of the bill argue that it guards against administrative errors and ensures that taxpayer rights are protected, reflecting a dichotomy in perspectives on local control versus taxpayer protection.