Connecticut Senate Bill SB00294

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/14
• Refer: 2/26/14
• Report Pass: 3/11/14
• Refer: 3/21/14
• Report Pass: 3/27/14
• Refer: 4/9/14
• Report Pass: 4/15/14
• Report Pass: 4/16/14
• Refer: 4/17/14
• Report Pass: 4/23/14
• Refer: 4/24/14
• Report Pass: 4/28/14
• Report Pass: 4/29/14

Caption

An Act Concerning Criminal Background Checks And The Departments Of Children And Families And Developmental Services.

Impact

If enacted, SB00294 would fundamentally impact the state's employment policies within Departments of Developmental Services and Children and Families. This includes the standardization of criminal background checks not only for department employees but also extends to private sector service providers who contract with these departments. The inclusion of annual checks for current employees signifies a proactive approach toward maintaining a safe environment for individuals in care, thus promoting accountability among those working with at-risk populations.

Summary

SB00294, titled 'An Act Concerning Criminal Background Checks And The Departments Of Children And Families And Developmental Services', aims to enhance the safety and oversight of programs providing direct services to individuals with intellectual disabilities as well as children in the custody of state agencies. This legislation mandates that applicants and employees involved in these programs undergo comprehensive criminal background checks. The requirement is particularly focused on those who have direct contact with vulnerable populations, ensuring that only individuals without a criminal history can provide these sensitive services. The intended outcome is to reinforce the integrity and safety of services provided under these departments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00294 appears to be supportive among legislators and advocacy groups focused on child safety and protection for individuals with disabilities. Proponents argue that criminal background checks are a necessary safeguard that can lead to improved outcomes and enhanced trust in the services provided. However, there may also be concerns regarding privacy and the potential for unjust exclusions based solely on past incidents that may not reflect an individual's current character or capability.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the implementation of these checks, particularly in terms of the logistics and costs associated with conducting background checks for private sector providers. Some stakeholders could argue that this law could create barriers to employment for individuals with past minor criminal records or deter qualified candidates due to the perceived scrutiny. There may also be discussions about the appropriateness of state-level mandates overriding local or organizational hiring policies as it relates to assessing the qualifications of employees serving sensitive roles.