Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00316

Introduced
2/27/14  
Introduced
2/27/14  
Refer
2/27/14  
Refer
2/27/14  
Report Pass
3/17/14  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Labeling Of Food Products That Are Packaged In Materials That Contain Bisphenol-a.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would modify existing laws surrounding food safety and consumer protection in the state. Specifically, it would prohibit the distribution and sale of food packaging that contains BPA unless labeled accordingly, taking effect from January 1, 2015. The enforcement of this regulation would be the responsibility of the Commissioner of Consumer Protection. Therefore, manufacturers and distributors would need to adapt their labeling practices to comply with the new requirement, potentially leading to increased operational costs and changes in packaging materials.

Summary

SB00316, titled An Act Requiring The Labeling Of Food Products That Are Packaged In Materials That Contain Bisphenol-A, addresses consumer safety by mandating that any food packaging containing bisphenol-A (BPA) must carry a label stating this clearly. The legislation aims to provide consumers with transparent information about the materials used in food packaging, especially given the potential health risks associated with BPA, particularly in food contact materials. The bill specifies that the label must be conspicuous and easily readable, thus emphasizing the importance of consumer awareness regarding food safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB00316 appears to lean towards supporting consumer safety and transparency. Proponents argue that it is essential for public health, particularly for vulnerable populations, including children and pregnant women, who might be more susceptible to the effects of BPA. Nonetheless, there could be some opposition from industry stakeholders concerned about the financial implications of re-labeling and potential changes in product formulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB00316 may involve the balance between regulatory oversight and the burden on businesses. While supporters assert the necessity for consumer safety, critics may highlight the economic impact on manufacturers. Additionally, discussions around the science behind the dangers of BPA and the effectiveness of labeling as a means of consumer protection may also be central to the debate on this legislation. As such, the bill invokes important considerations about health policy, corporate responsibility, and informed consumer choices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00292

An Act Concerning The Use Of Pfas In Certain Products.

CT SB00191

An Act Concerning Food Scrap Diversion From The Solid Waste Stream And The Redemption Of Out-of-state Beverage Containers.

CT HB05235

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

CT SB00200

An Act Concerning Social Equity Applicants, Infused Beverages And Moderate-thc Hemp Products.

CT HB05149

An Act Concerning Cafe And Package Store Permittees.

CT HB05150

An Act Concerning Cannabis And Hemp Regulation.

CT SB00128

An Act Concerning Certain Flame Retardant Chemicals In Children's Products.

CT SB00196

An Act Concerning The Harvesting Of Rabbits For The Local Food Supply.

CT HB05351

An Act Studying The Need For An Extended Producer Responsibility Program For Carpets.

CT HB05226

An Act Establishing An Extended Producer Responsibility Program For Consumer Batteries.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.