Connecticut House Bill HB05222

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/15
• Refer: 1/9/15

Caption

An Act Concerning Eligibility For A Permit To Carry A Pistol Or Revolver.

Impact

The passage of HB 05222 would have significant implications for gun control laws within the state. By extending the disqualification criteria to include convictions from other states, the bill would effectively tighten the standards for permit eligibility. Proponents of the bill argue that this measure is necessary for enhancing public safety by restricting access to firearms for individuals who have demonstrated a disregard for the law, therefore promoting a safer environment for residents. The proposed changes are also designed to prevent individuals from exploiting less stringent laws in other states to bypass local regulations.

Summary

House Bill 05222 aims to amend existing regulations related to the eligibility requirements for obtaining a permit to carry a pistol or revolver in the state. The bill specifically proposes that any applicant who has been convicted of a criminal offense in any state, where the offense is equivalent to a disqualifying offense as defined under state law, would be prohibited from receiving a permit. This change seeks to harmonize the criteria for permit eligibility across state lines, ensuring that individuals with similar criminal backgrounds are uniformly disqualified from being issued a permit regardless of where they were convicted.

Contention

However, the bill has sparked debate among legislators and the public. Critics may argue that such restrictions could unfairly affect individuals who have served their time and are trying to reintegrate into society, as they would face continued restrictions on their rights long after their convictions. Lawmakers concerned about the implications of the bill may position it as an infringement on second amendment rights, raising questions about due process and fairness for those with past offenses. Additionally, there are discussions regarding the clarity of what constitutes a 'disqualifying criminal offense,' which could lead to legal ambiguities and challenges in implementation.