Connecticut House Bill HB06832

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/15
• Refer: 2/19/15
• Report Pass: 3/10/15
• Refer: 3/20/15
• Report Pass: 3/26/15

Caption

An Act Repealing The High Performance Work Organization Program And Threshold Project Provisions Concerning Financial Assistance Awarded By The Department Of Economic And Community Development And Connecticut Innovations, Incorporated.

Impact

The repeal of the High-Performance Work Organization Program signifies a significant shift in how Connecticut approaches workforce development and support for business organizations. Supporters claim that removing these provisions will allow for a more flexible and market-driven approach to financial assistance, enabling better alignment with current economic needs and business growth strategies. The intention is to create a more efficient funding mechanism that directly responds to the changing landscape of the economy.

Summary

House Bill 6832 aims to repeal several provisions related to the High-Performance Work Organization Program and threshold project guidelines concerning financial assistance awarded by the Department of Economic and Community Development and Connecticut Innovations, Incorporated. The bill seeks to streamline the procedures surrounding economic assistance programs by eliminating outdated or underutilized provisions. By doing so, it intends to enhance coherence in the state's economic development initiatives, potentially making funds more accessible for businesses looking to expand or innovate.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6832 is mixed. Proponents view the repeal as a necessary step towards modernization and efficiency in state economic programs. They argue that it will sustain economic growth by ensuring that businesses receive relevant assistance without the burden of navigating outdated regulations. Conversely, some stakeholders express concerns that this move could limit support for specific initiatives that promote high-performance work practices, potentially impacting worker development and job quality in various sectors.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from labor advocates and workforce development organizations who fear that eliminating these programs might undermine efforts to incentivize high-performance work environments. They argue that without specific programs aimed at promoting workplace improvements, the state risks missing out on opportunities to enhance productivity and employee satisfaction. The discussion highlights a fundamental debate about the best methods for fostering economic growth and whether the repeal of such provisions may adversely affect Connecticut's labor market.