Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06869

Introduced
2/20/15  
Refer
2/20/15  
Report Pass
3/17/15  
Report Pass
3/17/15  
Refer
3/26/15  
Refer
3/26/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Automotive Glass Work Appointments.

Impact

The implementation of HB 6869 will modify existing laws governing the claims process for automotive glass repair by removing restrictions that previously limited consumer choices. This change is expected to empower consumers, allowing them to select licensed repair shops without undue influence from their insurance providers. By amending Section 38a-354a of the general statutes, the bill aims to streamline the appointment scheduling process and improve the overall experience for consumers dealing with insurance claims related to automotive glass damage.

Summary

House Bill 6869 aims to address consumer rights regarding automotive glass work appointments by regulating how insurance companies and claims administrators interact with policyholders. The bill prohibits auto appraisers and insurers from requiring insured individuals to use specified glass repair facilities, ensuring that consumers have the freedom to choose their repair shop. This gives consumers more control over the repair process and strengthens their rights in the claims process. The legislation is designed to enhance transparency and fairness in the automotive glass repair industry.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding Bill HB 6869 appears to be largely positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and individuals who support greater autonomy in the claims process. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary step towards consumer empowerment and protecting the rights of policyholders. However, there may be concerns among some insurance companies about the implications for their business practices and cost management, as this bill could potentially alter how claims are processed and managed.

Contention

Potential points of contention surrounding HB 6869 may involve the insurance industry’s response to the regulations imposed by the bill. Some insurers may view the removal of specific requirements as a challenge to their control over the claims procedure, arguing it could lead to complications such as delays in repair work or complications in ensuring service quality. However, supporters of the bill contend that it promotes competition among repair facilities and ultimately benefits consumers by allowing them to select shops based on preferences rather than constraints imposed by their insurers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00398

An Act Concerning The Regulation And Taxation Of Travel Insurance And Associated Entities, Products And Professionals.

CT SB00008

An Act Concerning Drug Affordability.

CT SB00395

An Act Concerning The Reporting Of Medical Debt.

CT HB05247

An Act Concerning Employee Health Benefit Consortiums.

CT SB00180

An Act Concerning Adverse Determination And Utilization Reviews.

CT SB00403

An Act Concerning Insurance Market Conduct And Insurance Licensing.

CT SB00369

An Act Concerning Home Care Worker Safety.

CT HB05250

An Act Concerning Self-service Storage Insurance.

CT SB00242

An Act Concerning The Office Of Health Strategy's Recommendations Regarding The All-payer Claims Database.

CT SB00241

An Act Concerning The Office Of Health Strategy's Recommendations Regarding 340b Program Transparency.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.