Connecticut Senate Bill SB00865

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/5/15
• Refer: 2/5/15
• Report Pass: 2/27/15
• Refer: 3/10/15
• Report Pass: 3/17/15
• Refer: 4/8/15
• Report Pass: 4/14/15
• Report Pass: 4/15/15
• Refer: 4/22/15
• Report Pass: 4/28/15
• Report Pass: 4/30/15
• Engrossed: 5/19/15
• Report Pass: 5/21/15
• Chaptered: 6/9/15
• Enrolled: 6/11/15
• Passed: 6/19/15

Caption

An Act Concerning Allowable Costs For The Installation Of Certain Oversized Water Mains.

Impact

The legislation intends to facilitate local governments in managing the aftermath of groundwater pollution by easing their financial burden through grant support. Municipalities can apply for funding to cover not only the immediate needs of providing drinking water but also for engineering reports and long-term solutions for water treatment systems. This structured support aims to enhance municipal capacities in addressing public health concerns related to contaminated water supplies.

Summary

Senate Bill 865 seeks to address the financial aspects related to the installation of oversized water mains, particularly in cases where groundwater pollution has rendered drinking water sources unusable. The bill allows municipalities that are not responsible for such pollution to apply for grants to cover the costs associated with providing potable drinking water. It emphasizes a comprehensive approach to not only the short-term but also the long-term solutions that aid in restoring and maintaining drinking water quality affected by pollution.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for public health and safety. Proponents argue that providing financial resources to municipalities is essential for ensuring that residents have access to clean drinking water, especially in areas affected by environmental pollution. Nonetheless, there may be some concerns regarding the long-term sustainability of such funding and whether it adequately addresses all communities' needs equally.

Contention

Some notable points of contention may include concerns about the effectiveness of the grants and whether they would reach all affected communities adequately. Additional debates could arise regarding the criteria for determining eligibility for grants and how to ensure accountability in their use. There may also be discussions about the potential for over-reliance on state funds versus encouraging local solutions and investments in water infrastructure.