Connecticut House Bill HJ00047

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Harold R. Bell.

Impact

The passage of HJ00047 carries implications for claims against the state, particularly in establishing a precedent that legitimizes the dismissal of claims deemed not viable by the Claims Commissioner. This process serves a protective function for the state, potentially reducing the burden of legal claims that can arise against it and emphasizing the state's legal protections when adjudicating claims related to state liabilities. If endorsed, it solidifies the authority of the Claims Commissioner in managing such disputes.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 47, introduced during the February Session of 2016, is a legislative proposal confirming the decision made by the Claims Commissioner regarding the claim filed by Harold R. Bell against the State. The resolution aims to affirm the dismissal of this claim, which amounts to over twenty thousand dollars. It demonstrates the procedural aspect of handling claims against the state and the authority vested in the Claims Commissioner to evaluate such cases.

Contention

While the resolution itself might not generate widespread contention, it can raise fundamental questions about the nature of state accountability in relation to individual claims. Critics may argue that an undue confirmation of dismissals might lead to scenarios where individuals could feel disenfranchised if legitimate claims are not thoroughly pursued. The resolution's passage reflects a legal framework that some may see as reinforcing state power in the realm of public claims, potentially stifacing personal recourse in legal matters.