Connecticut House Bill HJ00063

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Jason M. Day.

Impact

The confirmation of the Claims Commissioner's decision through HJ00063 impacts the rights of individuals seeking compensation from the state. By affirming the dismissal of Day's claim, it reinforces the role of the Claims Commissioner as a critical arbiter in determining the validity and merit of claims against state entities. This also suggests a limitation on the capacity for individuals to appeal decisions made by the Commissioner, particularly in high-value claims, thus influencing how claims against the state are processed and resolved in the future.

Summary

HJ00063 is a resolution from the General Assembly aimed at confirming the Claims Commissioner's decision to dismiss a claim brought against the state by Jason M. Day. The bill is centered around the legal assessment of claims made against state authorities, specifically addressing the dismissal of claims that exceed a threshold of twenty thousand dollars. The resolution serves to solidify the action taken by the Claims Commissioner, ensuring that the dismissal is formally recognized by the legislature.

Contention

While the bill does not appear to contain widespread points of contention in its straightforward confirmation of a dismissal, implications arise concerning the precedent it sets for future claims. There may be concern among stakeholders about the mechanisms of the Claims Commissioner's office and how claims are evaluated. Questions surrounding transparency and the fairness of the dismissal process could emerge, especially from individuals who might feel adversely affected by the resolution and their inability to contest significant financial claims against the state.