Connecticut House Bill HJ00084

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of James A. Harnage.

Impact

The impact of HJ00084 on state laws is significant in that it outlines the procedures related to claims against the state and reinforces the authority of the Claims Commissioner. By approving the dismissal of Harnage's claim, the resolution suggests a threshold for the validity of claims against the state, reinforcing the importance of proper channels and potentially reaffirming the state's position on financial liabilities. It signals a strong stance on the management of claims, particularly those that might arise from disputes over state actions.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 84 (HJ00084) specifically addresses the decision of the Claims Commissioner regarding a financial claim made by James A. Harnage against the state. The resolution confirms the dismissal of this claim, which exceeds twenty thousand dollars. In essence, it legitimizes the commissioner's ruling and limits potential financial liability for the state concerning this specific matter. Such resolutions are typically procedural and serve to affirm findings from earlier hearings or investigations.

Contention

While the resolution itself is straightforward, it could evoke discussions around the broader implications for individuals seeking to hold the state accountable for any grievances. The process and decisions of the Claims Commissioner could be seen as contentious if similar claims arise in the future, particularly regarding the transparency of the claims process and the subjects being dismissed. Critics may argue that the mechanism lacks sufficient oversight or that individuals' claims, especially those involving significant amounts, may not be fully heard, potentially leading to inequalities in how claims are managed.