Connecticut House Bill HJ00173

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/18/16
• Report Pass: 4/18/16
• Report Pass: 4/22/16

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Barbara Brazzel-massaro Of Trumbull To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Impact

The resolution directly impacts the state's judicial landscape by affirmatively placing Judge Brazzel-Massaro into a significant judicial role. Her appointment to the Superior Court is expected to influence various legal decisions within the state, given the court's authority over a broad range of civil and criminal cases. The commitment to a fixed term ensures stability in the judicial system and allows the judiciary to maintain continuity despite changes in the executive branch. Furthermore, it reflects the state's governance in ensuring that qualified candidates are placed into influential positions.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 173 is a resolution that confirms the nomination of the Honorable Barbara Brazzel-Massaro of Trumbull to serve as a Judge of the Superior Court for a term of eight years, beginning May 7, 2016. The resolution was sponsored by Representative Tong and Senator Coleman, and it plays a vital role in the judicial appointment process within the state. This confirmation not only signifies the legislative support for Judge Brazzel-Massaro but also illustrates the state Assembly's role in the checks and balances of the judicial appointment powers held by the Governor.

Contention

While the resolution ultimately passed with a unanimous vote, discussions around judicial nominations often invoke various points of contention, particularly surrounding the qualifications and backgrounds of nominees. Supporters of the resolution highlighted Judge Brazzel-Massaro's qualifications and previous experience, suggesting that her appointment would be beneficial for the judiciary. However, opponents may raise concerns regarding the nomination process itself, advocating for more transparency and public input in judicial appointments to ensure public trust in the judicial system.