Connecticut Senate Bill SB00347

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/16
• Refer: 3/2/16
• Report Pass: 3/28/16
• Refer: 4/8/16
• Report Pass: 4/14/16
• Engrossed: 4/19/16
• Report Pass: 4/21/16
• Chaptered: 5/25/16
• Enrolled: 5/26/16
• Passed: 6/10/16

Caption

An Act Establishing A Program For Court Appointed Special Advocates In Certain Juvenile Court Matters.

Impact

The creation of this program signifies an important step towards improving the judicial processes related to children's welfare. By allowing CASAs to conduct independent investigations and facilitate communication among various parties, the bill seeks to ensure that children receive adequate support and representation in judicial matters. This program is expected to provide additional resources and ultimately foster better outcomes for vulnerable youth engaged in court issues.

Summary

SB00347 establishes a program for Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) to support juvenile court matters involving children under the age of 18. The act aims to recruit, train, and supervise volunteers who serve as advocates in the best interest of children in legal proceedings. This program will be administered by the Chief Court Administrator in the juvenile court and aims to enhance legal representation for minors affected by court petitions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00347 is generally positive, as it underscores a commitment to child advocacy and welfare. Supporters praise the bill for establishing a crucial safety net while ensuring that children's voices are heard during legal proceedings. Advocates contend that having trained volunteers can significantly improve the judicial experience for minors, ensuring that their best interests are prioritized.

Contention

One potential point of contention could arise regarding the resources necessary to implement and manage the CASA program effectively. Critics may question whether state funding will be sufficient to ensure the program's sustainability and the thorough training of advocates. Additionally, concerns may surface around the screening processes for volunteers and the adequacy of oversight mechanisms to ensure the safety and appropriateness of volunteers serving as advocates.