Connecticut House Bill HB05552

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/17
• Refer: 1/12/17

Caption

An Act Excluding Retirement Benefits From Collective Bargaining By State And Municipal Employees.

Impact

If passed, HB 05552 will significantly impact state and municipal employment policies with regard to collective bargaining. By officially removing retirement benefits from the topics eligible for negotiation, the law would restrict the subjects available to labor unions when negotiating contracts for their members. This could lead to decreased negotiation power for public employee unions, which traditionally include retirement benefits as a core component of their bargaining efforts. The bill also indicates a shift in the balance of power in labor relations, favoring state and municipal management over public employees’ unions.

Summary

House Bill 05552 proposes to amend chapters 68 and 113 of the general statutes to exclude retirement benefits from collective bargaining by state and municipal employees. This legislative change is designed to align Connecticut's collective bargaining regulations with those of neighboring states, which may already restrict the inclusion of retirement benefits in bargaining agreements. The bill's proponents argue that excluding these benefits from negotiations will streamline the collective bargaining process and reduce the complexity of discussions between state or municipal employers and their employees.

Contention

The introduction of HB 05552 has sparked debate among lawmakers and labor advocates. Supporters of the bill contend that it is necessary for fiscal responsibility and aligning with best practices observed in other states. They argue that allowing collective bargaining over retirement benefits could lead to unsustainable costs for public employers. Conversely, opponents, including labor unions and some Democratic legislators, argue that the bill undermines workers' rights to negotiate essential aspects of their compensation packages. They claim that this will result in diminished retirement security for future state and municipal employees, making it more difficult for public service to attract and retain qualified workers.