Connecticut Senate Bill SB00285

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/17
• Refer: 1/19/17
• Refer: 2/16/17
• Report Pass: 3/20/17
• Refer: 3/29/17
• Report Pass: 4/4/17

Caption

An Act Concerning The Suspension Of Certain Civil Penalties Assessed By The Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection On Business Entities Pursuant To The Regulations Of Connecticut State Agencies.

Impact

The bill aims to encourage compliance among businesses by allowing them to address infractions without the immediate financial burden of penalties. The regulation is applicable to conditions that can be remedied and does not apply to severe violations that could harm human health or the environment. By ensuring that businesses are given an opportunity to correct minor infractions, the bill is seen as a positive step towards supporting economic activity while balancing regulatory obligations.

Summary

SB00285, titled 'An Act Concerning the Suspension of Certain Civil Penalties Assessed by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection on Business Entities', is designed to provide a mechanism for the temporary suspension of civil penalties levied against business entities by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP). Specifically, the bill allows a suspension of penalties for first-time violations if the business can remedy the violation within a specified timeframe and submits a request to DEEP within thirty days of being assessed a penalty.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SB00285 appears to be supportive among business representatives and some legislators who view it as a fair approach to regulatory compliance. They argue that it promotes accountability without imposing undue financial hardship on businesses striving to meet environmental standards. However, there are concerns from environmental advocacy groups who fear that this may inadvertently lead to leniency for businesses that violate significant environmental protections.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the criteria for what constitutes a 'first violation' and the potential loopholes that could arise, enabling businesses to exploit the suspension mechanism. Critics are worried that such provisions might dilute the enforcement of environmental regulations, particularly if businesses do not take the necessary corrective actions seriously or if penalties can be continuously deferred. This debate underscores a tension between fostering a business-friendly environment and ensuring robust environmental protection.