Connecticut Senate Bill SB01041

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/17/17
• Refer: 3/17/17
• Report Pass: 4/4/17
• Refer: 4/13/17
• Report Pass: 4/20/17
• Engrossed: 5/25/17
• Report Pass: 5/26/17

Caption

An Act Concerning Gps Monitoring Of Convicted Persons Awaiting Sentencing For Aggravated Sexual Assault.

Impact

The bill will revise the legal framework surrounding conditions of release for certain convicted offenders in Connecticut. By enforcing GPS monitoring, the state aims to mitigate risks associated with releasing individuals who may pose a danger to the community. As a result, law enforcement agencies will have additional tools to monitor offenders, potentially leading to improved monitoring compliance and community safety. It may also prompt broader discussions on the effectiveness and implications of electronic monitoring technologies across other types of crimes.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 1041 introduces a mandate for electronic monitoring via GPS for individuals convicted of specific offenses related to aggravated sexual assault while they await sentencing. Effective from October 1, 2017, this legislation aims to enhance public safety by ensuring that individuals convicted of serious sexual offenses remain monitored during a critical period when they are not yet sentenced. The bill directly amends existing statutes to include electronic monitoring as a condition of release, marking a significant shift in how the state manages individuals awaiting sentencing for serious crimes.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB01041 appears to be largely supportive within the legislative body, as evidenced by the unanimous Senate vote of 36-0 in favor of the bill. Proponents argue that the introduction of electronic monitoring is a necessary step to protect community safety, particularly when it comes to sexual offenses. However, there may be concerns among some stakeholders regarding privacy implications and the effectiveness of GPS technology in actual monitoring scenarios. These aspects could spark debates on balancing public safety and individual rights.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for implementing GPS monitoring for convicted individuals awaiting sentencing, notable points of contention may revolve around the implications of such monitoring. Critics may argue whether electronic monitoring sufficiently addresses safety concerns or if it merely serves as a punitive measure without ensuring rehabilitation or reducing recidivism. Furthermore, there may be discussions about the costs associated with implementing and maintaining GPS monitoring systems and how they affect broader aspects of the criminal justice system.