Connecticut House Bill HB05505

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/18
• Refer: 3/9/18
• Report Pass: 4/2/18
• Refer: 4/12/18
• Report Pass: 4/18/18
• Refer: 4/24/18

Caption

An Act Promoting The Expeditious Resolution Of Commercial Cases In The State.

Impact

The enactment of HB 5505 is expected to significantly impact the handling of commercial cases in Connecticut by creating a niche court aimed at reducing the time and complexities traditionally associated with these kinds of disputes. The establishment of the center allows for tailored procedures, including expedited adjudication processes and mandatory mediation, thereby seeking to alleviate the burden on the regular court system and promote a quicker resolution for businesses involved in legal disputes.

Summary

House Bill 5505, introduced in the Connecticut General Assembly, focuses on promoting the expeditious resolution of commercial cases within the state. The bill establishes the Connecticut Center for Commercial Claims, which is intended to provide a specialized court session for resolving commercial disputes exceeding $500,000. This bill aims to streamline the judicial process for significant business-related cases, addressing issues such as breach of contract, fraud, and other commercial-related torts, thus encouraging faster resolution through a dedicated legal framework.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill seems to be positive among business communities and legal professionals who support efforts to enhance judicial efficiency. Proponents argue that the ability to resolve commercial disputes more rapidly will bolster the business environment within the state, attracting more commercial activities. However, there are concerns about whether the focus on expedience may compromise the quality of justice in complex cases. Stakeholders remain divided on how best to balance efficiency with thoroughness in legal proceedings.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the specifics of how cases will be managed within the new center, including the per diem fees associated with cases and the selection process for judges. Critics might question whether the establishment of such a specialized court could lead to disparities in how commercial cases are treated compared to other civil matters, especially regarding access to justice for smaller businesses or individuals. The litigation costs and the potential for limited judicial oversight in expedited settings are likely to be focal points in ongoing legislative discussions.