Connecticut House Bill HJ00043

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/19/18
• Refer: 3/19/18

Caption

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of The Claim Of Rayshawn Bugg.

Impact

This resolution is significant because it highlights the procedural considerations around claims filed against the state. By allowing more time for the Claims Commissioner, it reflects a commitment to a more comprehensive evaluation of claims before reaching a conclusive settlement. The legislative approach aims to strike a balance between expediting the claims process and maintaining fairness and due diligence in how claims are resolved. This move may be viewed favorably by those who believe in the importance of thoroughness in governmental proceedings, especially concerning claims that could involve sensitive or complex matters.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 43 aims to grant the Claims Commissioner an extension of one year to dispose of the claim made by Rayshawn Bugg against the state. This resolution addresses the specific claim number 24104 filed with the commissioner. The intent is to provide additional time for a thorough review and resolution of the claim, ensuring that all necessary considerations are addressed adequately before a final decision is made. The extension is limited to a one-year period from the enactment date of the resolution, underlining the importance of timely yet careful review processes in state claims management.

Contention

While there are no direct indications of contention surrounding this specific resolution, the implications of extending the timeline for claim disposals could lead to discussions on efficiency in the claims processing system. Critics may argue that extending deadlines could potentially delay justice for claimants. On the other hand, proponents of the extension might emphasize the need for thorough examination of claims to ensure that the state acts justly and equitably. The discussion surrounding time extensions could open up broader debates pertaining to how states manage claims and the broader implications for public accountability.