Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HJ00065

Introduced
3/19/18  
Refer
3/19/18  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Ozzie Gooding.

Impact

This resolution carries significant implications for the claims process against the state. By confirming the Claims Commissioner's decision, it legitimizes the process through which claims are evaluated and the outcomes established. The resolution emphasizes the accountability of the Claims Commissioner and serves as an important procedural step in the governance of state finances and claims against it.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 65, introduced during the February Session of 2018, pertains to the confirmation of a decision made by the Claims Commissioner regarding a financial claim against the state. The resolution specifically confirms the denial of a claim filed by Ozzie Gooding, which was recorded under file number 22617 and involved an amount exceeding twenty thousand dollars. The purpose of this resolution is to affirm the Claims Commissioner's decision and ensure that the findings are officially recognized by the legislative assembly.

Conclusion

HJ00065 stands as a formal expression of the legislative body to uphold the administrative decisions made by the Claims Commissioner. It encapsulates the state’s approach to managing claims against it, indicating a definitive stance in the event of disputes over such claims. Through this resolution, the General Assembly reiterates its role in endorsing the operational decisions taken within the state’s administrative framework.

Contention

While the resolution is straightforward in confirming a denial, such decisions can elicit contention depending on the nature of the claims and the circumstances surrounding them. This is especially the case when individuals believe their claims have merit, or when the denial has broader implications for financial support or compensation that might affect the claimant's livelihood. Issues concerning transparency in claims processes can also arise, as claimants may seek clarity on how decisions are made and the criteria used by the Claims Commissioner.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HJ00178

Resolution Confirming The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00197

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Jane Doe.

CT HJ00176

Resolution Confirming The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00199

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Joseph Bernardo.

CT HJ00191

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Rosa Lee Klaneski.

CT SJ00163

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Roberta Sabo.

CT SJ00188

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Mary Cunningham.

CT SJ00187

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Brian Chandler.

CT SJ00172

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Havital Miltz.

CT SJ00158

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.