Connecticut Senate Bill SB00239

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/18
• Refer: 2/23/18
• Report Pass: 4/3/18
• Refer: 4/9/18
• Report Pass: 4/16/18

Caption

An Act Concerning Global Positioning System Monitoring Of Convicted Persons Awaiting Sentencing For Aggravated Sexual Assault.

Impact

The implementation of SB 239 signifies a shift in how the judicial system approaches the conditional release of convicted individuals. By mandating electronic monitoring for serious offenders, the bill aims to reduce the risk of reoffending during the period before sentencing. This means that courts will have additional tools to ensure compliance with release conditions and maintain a higher level of oversight over individuals waiting for their legal outcomes. As a result, the bill may lead to changes in law enforcement practice and increased use of technology in monitoring criminal behavior.

Summary

Senate Bill 239, titled 'An Act Concerning Global Positioning System Monitoring Of Convicted Persons Awaiting Sentencing For Aggravated Sexual Assault,' aims to enhance public safety by implementing mandatory electronic monitoring for individuals convicted of specific serious sexual offenses while they await sentencing. The bill allows courts to impose GPS monitoring as a condition of release, specifically targeting offenders of aggravated sexual assault crimes. This initiative reflects a growing trend in legislative measures that impose stricter surveillance on individuals deemed to pose a threat to community safety until they receive their sentencing.

Sentiment

Emotions surrounding SB 239 are largely supportive among legislators and constituents concerned about community safety. Proponents argue that it is a necessary step to protect the public from potentially dangerous individuals who might re-offend if released without stringent conditions. However, there are also concerns from civil rights advocates who worry that such measures might infringe on individual freedoms and could lead to overreach in monitoring practices. The debate reflects a balancing act between ensuring public safety and respecting personal liberties.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding the bill include the potential financial burdens it places on individuals required to pay for their GPS monitoring services, and the disparities in service access for low-income offenders. The bill includes provisions that would allow courts to waive monitoring fees for indigent individuals, but there is ongoing concern about how effectively these stipulations will be implemented. Additionally, critics argue about the ethical implications of mandatory monitoring, fearing it could lead to a system of surveillance that punishes individuals for their past actions without addressing underlying issues of rehabilitation.