Connecticut Senate Bill SB00274

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/18
• Refer: 2/28/18
• Report Pass: 3/16/18
• Refer: 3/29/18
• Report Pass: 4/5/18
• Refer: 4/17/18

Caption

An Act Concerning The Assessment Of Municipal Taxes On Certain Residential Dwellings.

Impact

The proposed changes will amend section 12-53a of the general statutes, specifically concerning how municipal taxes are assessed on residential properties under construction. This bill excludes the value of a dwelling under construction from tax assessments until specific conditions are met, such as the issuance of occupancy certificates. The anticipated effect of this legislation is to encourage residential development by reducing upfront tax liabilities for builders and new homeowners, potentially stimulating the housing market within municipalities across the state.

Summary

SB00274, known as 'An Act Concerning The Assessment Of Municipal Taxes On Certain Residential Dwellings', introduces significant changes to the taxation of newly constructed residential properties. The bill stipulates that completed new constructions will only begin incurring municipal taxes once a certificate of occupancy is issued or when the property is first used for its intended purpose. This adjustment aims to alleviate financial burdens on homeowners and developers during the construction process by deferring the start of tax liability until the properties are fully functional.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00274 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill provides necessary support to developers and new homeowners, promoting a more robust housing market by lessening financial strains during construction. However, detractors express concerns that delaying tax revenue for municipalities could hinder local finances, impacting services and infrastructure funding. The debate highlights the tension between facilitating development and ensuring adequate funding for community resources.

Contention

Key points of contention center around the financial implications for local governments and the potential for a loss in tax revenue during critical periods. Critics of the bill emphasize that while the intention is to support construction and promote homeownership, the practical outcomes might lead to budget shortfalls for municipalities, which rely on stable tax income for funding essential services. As discussions unfold, stakeholders are cautious about the balance between encouraging residential growth and maintaining fiscal integrity for local governments.