Connecticut Senate Bill SB00408

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/18
• Refer: 3/5/18
• Refer: 4/6/18
• Report Pass: 4/12/18

Caption

An Act Entering Connecticut Into The National Popular Vote Compact.

Impact

By joining the National Popular Vote Compact, Connecticut would amend the way its electoral votes are distributed. This could significantly impact the state's electoral power and influence in national elections, as it would contribute to a larger bloc of states advocating for the principle of a popular vote. If enacted, the bill could change how campaigns are run, focusing candidates' efforts on garnering votes nationwide rather than just concentrating on swing states. Moreover, this shift could lead to increased voter engagement as citizens may feel their votes are more meaningful in a popular vote context.

Summary

Senate Bill 408, titled 'An Act Entering Connecticut Into The National Popular Vote Compact', aims to formalize Connecticut's participation in a nationwide agreement among states to elect the President of the United States by means of a national popular vote. This act would require Connecticut to allocate its electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote, regardless of the outcome within the state itself. The ultimate goal of the compact is to ensure that every vote carries equal weight in the presidential election process, potentially altering the traditional electoral college dynamics.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 408 is mixed and has been debated extensively among legislators and constituents. Supporters argue that a national popular vote is a fairer system that rectifies the disparities inherent in the electoral college. They believe it enhances democratic representation, as every vote would be counted equally. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the potential loss of state control over presidential elections, questioning whether a national popular vote would genuinely reflect the will of the people within individual states. Some also fear that it could diminish the significance of rural voters in favor of urban centers, where population densities are higher.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 408 include worries about the viability of the compact if states representing a majority of electoral votes do not join, as the agreement only takes effect once such a threshold is achieved. There are also discussions surrounding the implications for state autonomy in deciding electoral processes and the potential unintended consequences of abolishing or undermining the electoral college. Legislators have voiced these opposing views during discussions, highlighting the bill's capacity to energize a broader conversation about voting rights and electoral reform in the United States.