Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00014

Introduced
2/7/18  
Refer
2/7/18  
Report Pass
2/17/18  
Report Pass
2/17/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Maureen D. Dennis Of Southport To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Votes

The resolution was brought to a vote on April 30, 2018, where it received overwhelming support, passing with 136 votes in favor and only 6 against. This strong affirmative vote suggests a general consensus on Judge Dennis's qualifications among legislators, though it does not entirely preclude opposition on philosophical or ideological grounds.

Impact

Confirmation of Judge Maureen D. Dennis signifies an important shift in the composition of the Superior Court, which may influence rulings and the judicial approach to various cases. Appointing judges with specific legal backgrounds or philosophies can lead to changes in how laws are interpreted and enforced, directly impacting state laws and the judicial landscape. The resolution reflects the importance of legislative oversight in the appointment of key judicial positions, which can set precedents for future nominations.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution No. 14 aims to confirm the nomination of The Honorable Maureen D. Dennis of Southport as a Judge of the Superior Court. This resolution is an essential procedural step in the judiciary process for appointing judges, demonstrating the state Assembly's role in confirming appointments made by the Governor. The resolution indicates a commitment to ensuring qualified candidates are placed in the judiciary, thus maintaining the integrity and functionality of the judicial system.

Contention

While the text of the resolution itself is straightforward, discussions surrounding judicial nominations often reveal underlying tensions regarding judicial philosophy and the representation of diverse perspectives within the judiciary. There may have been debates about Judge Dennis's qualifications or ideological stance, illustrating the partisan dynamics that can emerge during confirmation processes. These discussions highlight the significance of judicial appointments in shaping not only legal precedent but also public confidence in the judiciary.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SJ00195

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Pedro E. Segarra Of Hartford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00003

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable David P. Gold Of Middlefield To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00004

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable John B. Farley Of Bloomfield To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00010

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Matthew E. Frechette Of Branford To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00002

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Gerald L. Harmon Of Southington To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00011

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Mark T. Gould Of North Haven To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00012

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Barbara Bailey Jongbloed Of Madison To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00001

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Robert E. Young Of South Glastonbury To Be A Senior Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT HJ00017

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of The Honorable Dawne G. Westbrook Of Glastonbury To Be A Judge Of The Appellate Court And A Judge Of The Superior Court.

CT SJ00197

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Nicole J. Tung, Esquire, Of Cheshire To Be A Judge Of The Superior Court.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.