Connecticut House Bill HB07147

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 2/21/19
• Report Pass: 4/30/19
• Refer: 5/10/19
• Report Pass: 5/16/19

Caption

An Act Making Deficiency Appropriations For The Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2019.

Impact

The enactment of HB 07147 would allow the state to fulfill its financial commitments without disrupting the services provided to the citizens. The funding plan outlined in the bill emphasizes the importance of maintaining mental health, transportation services, and social support programs. With a total reallocation of approximately $45.3 million, the bill significantly impacts state law by adjusting appropriations to ensure that departments like the Department of Developmental Services and the Department of Correction can continue their operations without major cutbacks.

Summary

House Bill 07147, titled 'An Act Making Deficiency Appropriations For The Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2019,' aims to address budgetary shortfalls by appropriating necessary funds to several state agencies. This bill was introduced to ensure the continued operation of critical state services, including health care, transportation, and public safety, which are impacted by previous budget reductions. By reallocating funds from various state funds, the bill seeks to cover essential expenses that had been underestimated during initial budgeting processes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 07147 appears to be supportive, as existing fiscal challenges necessitate immediate action to secure funding for vital services. Legislators who back the bill have highlighted the need for legislative action to preempt potential crises in public health and safety services. Given its appropriation nature, the bill has garnered broad bipartisan support, signaling an agreement on the necessity of funding for state operations.

Contention

While the bill has generally received positive remarks, there are concerns regarding the long-term implications of repeated deficiency appropriations. Critics argue that reliance on such bills may indicate a deeper structural budget issue that needs addressing, rather than temporary fixes. Furthermore, adjustments to Medicaid and social services bonding raise questions about future funding stability, particularly as demographic demands and economic conditions evolve. The balance between immediate fiscal needs and sustainable budgeting practices remains a key point of discussion among lawmakers.