Connecticut House Bill HB07289

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/19
• Refer: 3/1/19

Caption

An Act Concerning The Entry Of A Money Judgment In A Summary Process Action.

Impact

If enacted, HB 07289 would amend Section 47a-26d of the general statutes to streamline and clarify the procedures involved when a complainant seeks recovery of possession and financial compensation from tenants who hold over beyond the terms of their lease or rental agreements. This legislative change is expected to facilitate a more efficient judicial process in landlord-tenant disputes and ultimately assist property owners in reclaiming their assets and outstanding funds.

Summary

House Bill 07289 proposes changes to the existing statutes concerning the entry of a money judgment in summary process actions. Specifically, the bill allows courts to enter judgments in favor of the prevailing party, enabling them to recover not only possession of properties but also monetary amounts due, including damages and attorney's fees. It establishes clear conditions under which such judgments could be entered, primarily involving cases where a defendant remains on the premises without the right to do so following a lease termination.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 07289 seeks to modernize and enhance the summary process for property disputes in Connecticut, focusing on expediency and clarity within the legal framework. Its implementation would require consideration of how to balance the rights of landlords with protections for tenants to ensure equitable outcomes in property-related legal disputes.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 07289 may arise from interpretations of tenant rights versus property owner rights. While the bill seemingly strengthens the position of property owners by enabling them to obtain both possession and financial recompense, critics may argue that it could disproportionately affect vulnerable tenants. Concerns could be raised regarding the fairness of the notice requirements that complainants must satisfy before a money judgment can be awarded, potentially leading to legal loopholes that could be exploited against tenants.